Opinion
2:19-cv-2227-JAD-BNW
10-28-2022
ROBERT L. GOLDMAN; Plaintiff, v. VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation and member of the CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES; DOES 1 through 100, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through 100, inclusive, Defendants.
MARQUIZ LAW OFFICE, P.C. BY CRAIG A. MARQUIZ ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP BY ROBERT W. FREEMAN PAMELA L. MCGAHA CHERYL A. GRAMES ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT BROENING OBERG WOODS & WILSON P.C. BY ROBERT T. SULLIVAN JASON P. KASTING ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
MARQUIZ LAW OFFICE, P.C. BY CRAIG A. MARQUIZ ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP BY ROBERT W. FREEMAN PAMELA L. MCGAHA CHERYL A. GRAMES ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
BROENING OBERG WOODS & WILSON P.C. BY ROBERT T. SULLIVAN JASON P. KASTING ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
STIPULATION & ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT
(First Request)
[ECF No. 86]
PLAINTIFF ROBERT L. GOLDMAN (“Plaintiff') and DEFENDANT VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Vigilant Insurance Company's Motion to Amend Judgment (ECF No. 85). Specifically, Plaintiff shall have through and including November 7, 2022 with which to file its Opposition brief. The extension is necessary due to Plaintiff counsel's recent return to the office following an international mission trip (October 7 - 19, 2022) and an out-of-state family emergency
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.