From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldman v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 4, 2021
CIVIL ACTION 20-110-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Feb. 4, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 20-110-SDD-EWD

02-04-2021

GOLDMAN v. TAYLOR, ET AL.


RULING

The Court has carefully considered the Complaint , the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes, dated January 1, 2021, to which an Objection was filed and also reviewed.

Rec. Doc. 1.

Rec. Doc. 14.

Rec. Doc. 15. --------

The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's herein.

ACCORDINGLY, this action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, as Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1997e, and this case is hereby CLOSED.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana the 4th day of February, 2021.

/s/ _________

CHIEF JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Goldman v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 4, 2021
CIVIL ACTION 20-110-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Feb. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Goldman v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:GOLDMAN v. TAYLOR, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 4, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 20-110-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Feb. 4, 2021)