From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldman v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Nov 17, 1939
173 Misc. 38 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)

Opinion

November 17, 1939.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, County of Queens.

Philip F. Rosenberg, for the appellant.

Shayer Schechter, for the respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and taxable disbursements to defendant, and motion granted, without costs.

The Home Owners' Loan Corporation is an instrumentality of the United States government, and, therefore, a public as distinguished from a private corporation. As such, it may not be required to submit to an examination before trial pursuant to section 288 of the Civil Practice Act. ( Lovero v. Home Owners' Loan Corporation 172 Misc. 754; Smith v. Citizens Savings Bank, 166 id. 843, and authorities therein cited.) No opinion.

All concur. Present — MacCRATE, LEWIS and McCOOEY, JJ


Summaries of

Goldman v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Nov 17, 1939
173 Misc. 38 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
Case details for

Goldman v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROSE GOLDMAN and BENJAMIN GOLDMAN, Respondents, v. HOME OWNERS' LOAN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1939

Citations

173 Misc. 38 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
15 N.Y.S.2d 968

Citing Cases

Wodetzky v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y

It has been held that a public corporation, as distinguished from a private corporation, may not be examined…