From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldman v. Hoehn

Kansas City Court of Appeals
Nov 6, 1933
64 S.W.2d 733 (Mo. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

November 6, 1933.

1. — Appeal and Error. Right of appeal is purely statutory and no appeal lies in absence of statute allowing it.

2. — Appeal and Error. Action of trial court in refusing to issue temporary restraining order was not a final judgment and an appeal therefrom will not lie.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Buchanan County. — Hon. J.V. Gaddy, Judge.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Ardey Gabbert and Emmett J. Crouse for appellant.

Silverman Strop for respondent.


Plaintiff, on August 2, 1933, brought this action in the Circuit Court of Buchanan County seeking to restrain the foreclosure of a deed of trust. On the day the petition was filed the plaintiff presented it to the Circuit Court of Buchanan County and asked that temporary restraining order be issued. The court, upon considering the petition, refused to grant temporary writ of injunction. Thereupon plaintiff filed motion for new trial, which was overruled. On the same day plaintiff sought and was granted an appeal to this court.

In the view we take of the case it is unnecessary to state the allegations of plaintiff's petition for the reason that we are without jurisdiction to review the action of the court in refusing to issue temporary restraining order.

It has been said many times that the right of appeal is purely statutory, and that no appeal lies in the absence of a statute allowing it. [Segall v. Garlick, 313 Mo. 409, 281 S.W. 693; DeJarnett v. Tickameyer, 40 S.W.2d 686.]

The action of the court in refusing to issue temporary restraining order was not a final judgment, and an appeal therefrom will not lie. [Kansas City Cable Railway Company v. State of Kansas, 29 Mo. App. 89, 95; Harrison v. Rush, 15 Mo. 175.]

The appeal is dismissed. Reynolds, C., concurs.


The foregoing opinion of CAMPBELL, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The appeal is dismissed. All concur.


Summaries of

Goldman v. Hoehn

Kansas City Court of Appeals
Nov 6, 1933
64 S.W.2d 733 (Mo. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

Goldman v. Hoehn

Case Details

Full title:SADIE GOLDMAN, APPELLANT, v. CHARLES H. HOEHN, RESPONDENT

Court:Kansas City Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 6, 1933

Citations

64 S.W.2d 733 (Mo. Ct. App. 1933)
64 S.W.2d 733

Citing Cases

Simms v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

If respondent filed a return to the order to show cause it has not been incorporated in the transcript on…

Phillips v. Missouri Dept. of Social Services

Appellant's claim for error in the circuit court's denial of her request for a temporary restraining order is…