From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldin v. Ramore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

October, 1926.

Present — Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ.


Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellant perfect the appeal for the November term (for which term the case is set down), and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Goldin v. Ramore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Goldin v. Ramore

Case Details

Full title:HENRY E. GOLDIN, Appellant, v. EMANUEL RAMORE and Others, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1926

Citations

218 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)