Opinion
Submitted January 14, 1921
Decided February 1, 1921
George Edwin Joseph for appellant.
Nathan Burkan for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Goldfish v. Goldfish
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 1, 1921
230 N.Y. 606 (N.Y. 1921)
Summaries of
Goldfish v. Goldfish
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 1, 1921
230 N.Y. 606 (N.Y. 1921)
Case details for
Goldfish v. Goldfish
Case Details
Full title:BLANCHE GOLDFISH, Respondent, v . SAMUEL GOLDFISH, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 1, 1921
Citations
230 N.Y. 606 (N.Y. 1921)
Citing Cases
Prouty v. Drake
Some of the portions of the judgment always remain subject to later judicial action; other portions do not.…
Matter of Van ArsdaleThe Court of Appeals affirmed, with express reservation of plaintiff's contract rights ( 260 N.Y. 432). In…