From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GOLDFEDER v. QUEENS SAV

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 12, 1982
113 Misc. 2d 649 (N.Y. App. Term 1982)

Opinion

January 12, 1982

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, JOSEPH ROSENZWEIG, J.

Dikman, Dikman Botter ( Allan S. Botter and Stephen Heffner of counsel), for appellant.

James R. Pieret for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order and judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously reversed, without costs, judgment vacated and motion denied. Order denying defendant's motion unanimously reversed, with $10 costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed.

In view of the unconditional terms contained in the separation agreement, signed by plaintiff and incorporated by reference into the judgment of divorce, plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any right, title or interest to the bank account in question and has failed to set forth a viable claim for damage as a result of the actions of the bank.

BUSCHMANN, J.P., JONES and KUNZEMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

GOLDFEDER v. QUEENS SAV

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 12, 1982
113 Misc. 2d 649 (N.Y. App. Term 1982)
Case details for

GOLDFEDER v. QUEENS SAV

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE GOLDFEDER, Respondent, v. QUEENS COUNTY SAVINGS BANK, Appellant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 12, 1982

Citations

113 Misc. 2d 649 (N.Y. App. Term 1982)
453 N.Y.S.2d 130

Citing Cases

Goldfeder v. Queens County Savings Bank

Since the plaintiff had no interest in the account at the time the defendant bank released the funds in the…