From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldfeder v. Lincoln

Supreme Court — Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1898
23 Misc. 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)

Opinion

April, 1898.

Leon Sanders, for appellant.

Abraham Oberstein, for respondent.


Without passing upon the sufficiency of the order, accompanied, as it is, by a statement of the justice's reasons for granting the same, the order must, nevertheless, be reversed, because of the omission to present an affidavit of merits. Thornall v. Turner, ante, p. 363.

The counsel for the defendant is in error as to the statement contained in his brief, that the order was filed on the 11th day of January, 1898. An examination of the return, on the contrary, shows that it was filed on the 10th day of January, 1898, the date mentioned in the notice of appeal. The order should, therefore, be reversed, with costs, and the motion remitted to the court below for further hearing, to be brought on, upon at least five days' notice, with leave to the defendant to file and serve an affidavit of merits.

BEEKMAN, P.J., and GILDERSLEEVE, J., concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and motion remitted to court below for further hearing, upon at least five days' notice, with leave to defendant to file and serve an affidavit of merits.


Summaries of

Goldfeder v. Lincoln

Supreme Court — Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1898
23 Misc. 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)
Case details for

Goldfeder v. Lincoln

Case Details

Full title:LEWIS GOLDFEDER, Appellant, v . DAVID LINCOLN, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court — Appellate Term

Date published: Apr 1, 1898

Citations

23 Misc. 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)