From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldfarb v. 65 East 11th Street Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 1972
40 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

October 19, 1972


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 1, 1972, granting plaintiff's motion to amend and supplement the complaint by adding a cause of action for wrongful death and by increasing the ad damnum clause, is unanimously reversed on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion denied. A prior application was denied without prejudice to renewal upon "proper papers including a physician's affidavit and an affidavit of merit by a person having knowledge of the facts." The papers submitted on this renewed application fail to comply with the prior order and are, in any event, deficient. On applications of this type, an affidavit of merits is necessary. (See e.g., Ferrari v. Paramount Plumbing Heating Co., 20 A.D.2d 878.) Despite such requirement, and despite the prior order, plaintiff failed to submit such an affidavit, and indeed, the papers which were submitted indicated a reluctance to provide the required affidavit of merits for fear of revealing the prima facie case. Additionally, while a physician's affidavit was submitted, it failed to set forth any factual basis or competent medical proof to support the conclusion that the subsequent death was caused by the original accident. (See McCarthy v. Downes, 17 A.D.2d 919; Scalzo v. Brunori, 17 A.D.2d 612.)

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Kupferman, Murphy, McNally and Tilzer, JJ.


Summaries of

Goldfarb v. 65 East 11th Street Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 1972
40 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Goldfarb v. 65 East 11th Street Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE GOLDFARB, as Executrix of MEYER GOLDFARB, Deceased, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Rosenblum v. Trinity Hudson Holdings

On that basis alone, the cross motion to amend the pleading must be denied. Goldfarb v 65 East 11th St Corp…

Hollister v. Mohawk Valley General Hospital

Since plaintiff did not set forth any factual basis or competent medical proof to support the claim that the…