From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldenstein v. Goldenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 14, 1967
28 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

September 14, 1967


Order entered June 6, 1967 modified on the law and the facts, without costs and disbursements, to the extent of striking therefrom the last two decretal paragraphs; and the matter is remanded to Special Term to fix, following a hearing at Special Term or before a Special Referee, the amount of the outgoing attorneys' lien, to be determined upon the basis of the value of the services rendered up to the time of his discharge, this amount to be a first lien upon any attorney's fees payable by plaintiff to defendant's attorneys and which may be allowed by the court, or payable on any settlement, and to be a first lien upon the proceeds of any settlement or recovery upon defendant's counterclaims. The court below erroneously required a release of the outgoing attorneys' file without adequate provision to secure the payment of such fee as it may be determined they were entitled to or alternative protection of their statutory lien pursuant to the provisions of section 475 Jud. of the Judiciary Law. Settle order on notice.

Concur — Stevens, J.P., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.


Summaries of

Goldenstein v. Goldenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 14, 1967
28 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Goldenstein v. Goldenstein

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD M. GOLDENSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. ERIN P. GOLDENSTEIN, Respondent, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 14, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Matter of M.E. v. S.G

However, Levitas ( supra) and other reported cases cited by relieved counsel, supporting this interpretation…

Levitas v. Levitas

Although it has long been established that a charging lien does not attach to an award of alimony (Turner v…