From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldenberg v. Russo

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 9, 2008
272 S.W.3d 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 90068.

December 9, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Paula Bryant, Judge.

Jack Itzkowitz, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

J. Richard McEachern, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.



ORDER


Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in plaintiffs favor in plaintiffs law-suit to recover an amount owing for services rendered. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Goldenberg v. Russo

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 9, 2008
272 S.W.3d 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Goldenberg v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:Stuart GOLDENBERG, P.C., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Timothy RUSSO…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Dec 9, 2008

Citations

272 S.W.3d 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)