From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldenberg v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1974
43 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

January 28, 1974


In a negligence and nuisance action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff's intestate, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 26, 1972, in favor of defendants, upon the trial court's dismissal of the complaint at a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The appeal did not raise questions of fact. The trial was the second jury trial of this case. At this second trial plaintiff presented the identical evidence that had been placed in the record at the first trial. At the end of plaintiff's case in the first trial, the court granted a motion to dismiss the complaint. On appeal, this court reversed and granted the new trial on the ground that plaintiff had made out a prima facie case ( Goldenberg v. City of New York, 39 A.D.2d 571). A trial court to which an action has been remitted by an appellate court for a new trial has no jurisdiction to review matters decided by the appellate court ( Hornstein v. Podwitz, 229 App. Div. 167, affd. 254 N.Y. 443). Gulotta, P.J., Martuscello, Latham, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goldenberg v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1974
43 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Goldenberg v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM GOLDENBERG, as Administrator of the Estate of DORA GOLDENBERG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1974

Citations

43 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Merino v.New York City Transit Authority

Indeed, that this is a viable theory of liability was established by this Court's prior remand of the case…

Matter of Town of Arietta v. State Board

In so ruling, we would initially note that the proceeding relative to the transition assessments for 1968 was…