From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golden v. State

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Oct 10, 2013
Appellate case number: 01-13-00546-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate case number: 01-13-00546-CR Trial court case number: 1833897

2013-10-10

Steven Golden v. The State of Texas


ORDER

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

Appellant, Steven Golden, has filed a "Motion to Abate for Entry of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law" and a "First Motion to Extend Deadline to File Appellate Brief." In his motion to abate, Golden states that the trial court held a pre-trial hearing on his motion to suppress evidence and denied the motion, he requested on the record that the trial court make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court has failed to make such findings of fact and conclusions of law. He requests that we abate this case, direct the trial court to make appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law, direct the trial court clerk to file a supplemental record containing such findings and conclusions, and extend the time to file his brief until 30 days after the supplemental clerk's record is filed in this Court. In his motion to extend, he requests that we extend the deadline to file his appellant's brief until such time as we rule on the motion to abate and "issue[] a new briefing deadline schedule." We grant both motions.

Golden requests abatement for findings and conclusions related to his motion to suppress evidence. He contends that the trial court's ruling on the record is insufficient for this Court "to review the decision without making assumptions regarding the legality of the traffic stop conducted on Appellant's vehicle" and that the trial court articulated no facts "to determine that reasonable suspicion existed to stop Appellant's vehicle[.]" If requested by the losing party on a motion to suppress, the trial court must provide findings of fact and conclusions of law, either in writing or on the record at the hearing, adequate to provide the appellate court with a basis to review the trial court's application of law to facts. See State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 698 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). At the end of the hearing on his motion to suppress, Golden requested written findings of fact and conclusions of law from the trial court. The record does not contain sufficient findings of fact or conclusions of law to provide this Court with a basis upon which to review the trial court's application of the law to the facts. As the losing party on a motion to suppress evidence, Golden is entitled to findings of fact and conclusions of law upon request. See id. Because the findings and conclusions related to his motion to suppress are insufficient, the proper remedy is to abate this case and remand to the trial court to make findings of fact with greater specificity. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4; State v. Mendoza, 365 S.W.3d 666, 670 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Cullen, 195 S.W.3d at 698.

Accordingly, we grant Golden's motion to abate and motion to extend his brief deadline. We abate the appeal and remand for the trial court to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations in this case, in conjunction with the trial court's denial of Golden's motion to suppress evidence. The trial court shall make the appropriate findings and conclusions and shall cause them to be filed with the trial court clerk within 20 days of the date of this order. We further order the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk's record containing the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order.

This appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court's active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court's active docket when the supplemental clerk's record is filed in this Court.

Appellant's brief will be due 30 days after the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are filed in this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellee's brief, if any, will be due 30 days from the date appellant's brief is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: Justice Jim Sharp

[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court


Summaries of

Golden v. State

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Oct 10, 2013
Appellate case number: 01-13-00546-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Golden v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven Golden v. The State of Texas

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Oct 10, 2013

Citations

Appellate case number: 01-13-00546-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 10, 2013)