From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golden v. Feudner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 4, 2011
No. CIV S-08-0356 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-0356 GEB DAD P.

April 4, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 23, 2010, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendant Feudner be denied. On March 1, 2011, the assigned district judge adopted the findings and recommendations in full and denied defendant's motion for summary judgment.

In due course, the court will issue a further scheduling order setting dates for pretrial statements, pretrial conference, and jury trial. However, before issuing the scheduling order, the court will set a mandatory settlement conference in this case. Pursuant to Local Rule 270(b), the parties will be directed to inform the court in writing as to whether they wish to proceed with the settlement conference before the undersigned magistrate judge or if they wish to proceed before a randomly-assigned magistrate judge.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within twenty-one days of the date of this order, each party shall inform the court in writing as to whether they wish to proceed with the settlement conference before the undersigned magistrate judge or if they wish to proceed before a randomly-assigned magistrate judge. If the parties wish to proceed before the undersigned magistrate judge, each party shall return to the court the consent form for settlement conferences provided with this order. If the parties do not wish the undersigned magistrate judge to preside at the settlement conference, each party shall file a declaration stating he wishes to proceed before a randomly-assigned magistrate judge; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send each party the consent form for settlement conferences.

DATED: April 1, 2011.

NOTICE OF WAIVER OF DISQUALIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT JUDGE PURSUANT TO LOCAL DRULE 270(b)

hereby requests that the assigned Magistrate Judge participate in a settlement conference in this action and hereby waives any claim of disqualification of the assigned Magistrate Judge on that basis thereafter.


Summaries of

Golden v. Feudner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 4, 2011
No. CIV S-08-0356 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Golden v. Feudner

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN GOLDEN, Plaintiff, v. S. FEUDNER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 4, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-08-0356 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)