Opinion
October 14, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Connell, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiffs established their prima facie entitlement to judgment, inter alia, by offering proof of the mortgages and the defendants' default in payments ( see, Colonial Commercial Corp. v Breskel Assocs., 238 A.D.2d 539; Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Kaye, 224 A.D.2d 578; Citibank v. Pierre, 213 A.D.2d 443). Since the defendants' opposition papers failed to demonstrate the existence of material issues of fact, the court properly granted the plaintiffs' motion ( see, Andre v. Pomeroy, 35 N.Y.2d 361; Citibank v. Pierre, supra; Kazakias v. Bistricer, 180 A.D.2d 666; Assing v United Rubber Supply Co., 126 A.D.2d 590).
Miller, J.P., Ritter, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.