From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golden Corral Corp. v. Ill. Union Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 11, 2022
No. 21-2119 (4th Cir. Aug. 11, 2022)

Summary

affirming decision rejecting insured's claim under North Carolina law based on Uncork, because insured failed to plausibly allege tangible, physical harm to covered property or a tangible loss of covered property

Summary of this case from ACAC Downtown, LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

Opinion

21-2119

08-11-2022

GOLDEN CORRAL CORP.; GOLDEN CORRAL FRANCHISING SYSTEMS INC., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

Gregg McDougal, Lawrence R. Duke, William R. Hartzell, MCDOUGAL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellants. Robert W. Fisher, James M. Bauer, CLYDE &CO U.S. LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Jennifer A. Welch, Theodore B. Smyth, CRANFILL SUMNER LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jonathan D. Hacker, Jenya Godina, O'MELVENY &MYERS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: July 20, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00349-D)

ON BRIEF:

Gregg McDougal, Lawrence R. Duke, William R. Hartzell, MCDOUGAL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellants.

Robert W. Fisher, James M. Bauer, CLYDE &CO U.S. LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Jennifer A. Welch, Theodore B. Smyth, CRANFILL SUMNER LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jonathan D. Hacker, Jenya Godina, O'MELVENY &MYERS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before AGEE and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Golden Corral Corporation and Golden Corral Franchising Systems, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Golden Corral"), appeal the district court's order granting Illinois Union Insurance Company's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings in Golden Corral's action seeking insurance benefits for business losses Golden Corral incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Golden Corral Corp. v. Ill. Union Ins. Co., No. 5:20-cv-00349-D (E.D. N.C. Sept. 8, 2021); see also Uncork &Create LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 27 F.4th 926, 933-34 (4th Cir. 2022) (holding that insurance "policy's coverage for business income loss and other expenses d[id] not apply to [plaintiff's] claim for financial losses [caused by the COVID-19 pandemic] in the absence of any material destruction or material harm to its covered premises" and further "observ[ing] that our holding is consistent with the unanimous decisions by our sister circuits, which have applied various states' laws to similar insurance claims and policy provisions").

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Golden Corral Corp. v. Ill. Union Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 11, 2022
No. 21-2119 (4th Cir. Aug. 11, 2022)

affirming decision rejecting insured's claim under North Carolina law based on Uncork, because insured failed to plausibly allege tangible, physical harm to covered property or a tangible loss of covered property

Summary of this case from ACAC Downtown, LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

following Uncork & Create

Summary of this case from Carilion Clinic v. Am. Guarantee & Liab. Ins. Co.
Case details for

Golden Corral Corp. v. Ill. Union Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:GOLDEN CORRAL CORP.; GOLDEN CORRAL FRANCHISING SYSTEMS INC., Plaintiffs …

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 11, 2022

Citations

No. 21-2119 (4th Cir. Aug. 11, 2022)

Citing Cases

Cato Corp. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

e also Uncork & Create LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 27 F.4th 926, 933 (4th Cir. 2022) (holding that the…

Carilion Clinic v. Am. Guarantee & Liab. Ins. Co.

. As was true with the court's February 4, 2022, memorandum opinion, the Fourth Circuit “observe[d] that our…