From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golden Bridge Tech., Inc. v. Apple Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 27, 2017
2016-1537 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1537

01-27-2017

GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. APPLE INC., Defendant-Appellee

JACK A. RUSSO, Computerlaw Group LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. LOWELL D. MEAD, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by TIMOTHY TETER, BENJAMIN G. DAMSTEDT; ERIN TRENDA, San Diego, CA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:12-cv-04882-PSG, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal.

JUDGMENT

JACK A. RUSSO, Computerlaw Group LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. LOWELL D. MEAD, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by TIMOTHY TETER, BENJAMIN G. DAMSTEDT; ERIN TRENDA, San Diego, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O'MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 27, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Golden Bridge Tech., Inc. v. Apple Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 27, 2017
2016-1537 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Golden Bridge Tech., Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. APPLE INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 27, 2017

Citations

2016-1537 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2017)