Opinion
No. 82251
03-09-2021
Greenberg Glusker Fields Clarnan & Machtinger Kennedy & Couvillier, PLLC Anderson McPharlin & Conners LLP/Las Vegas
Greenberg Glusker Fields Clarnan & Machtinger
Kennedy & Couvillier, PLLC
Anderson McPharlin & Conners LLP/Las Vegas
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to stay proceedings in a contract action. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we
We construe petitioner's request for "other extraordinary relief" as a request for a writ of prohibition.
--------
ORDER the petition DENIED.