From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldberg v. Gaming

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Apr 2, 2010
2:08-CV-1042 JCM (LRL) (D. Nev. Apr. 2, 2010)

Opinion

2:08-CV-1042 JCM (LRL).

April 2, 2010


ORDER


Presently before the court is the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt (Doc. # 4), filed on December 15, 2009.

Local Rule IB 3-1 states that any party wishing to object to the ruling of the magistrate judge on a pretrial matter shall file a specific objection within ten (10) days from the date of service of the magistrate judge's ruling. Here, no objections were filed.

On October 7, 2008, the court entered an order (Doc. # 3) denying plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2). The court further ordered plaintiff to either submit a completed application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk of te court or pay the filing fee of $350 in full. To date, plaintiff has not submitted a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee.

Upon review of the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation (Doc. # 4) and there being no objections filed,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that United States Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt (Doc. # 4) is AFFIRMED in its entirety. The instant action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Goldberg v. Gaming

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Apr 2, 2010
2:08-CV-1042 JCM (LRL) (D. Nev. Apr. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Goldberg v. Gaming

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD M. GOLDBERG, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN GAMING, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Apr 2, 2010

Citations

2:08-CV-1042 JCM (LRL) (D. Nev. Apr. 2, 2010)