From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golda v. Hutchinson Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 1995
219 A.D.2d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

September 29, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs' cross motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 (1). James Golda (plaintiff) was installing a gas meter when he was injured; that activity constitutes an "alteration" of the premises within the meaning of the statute (Atwell v Mountain Ltd., 184 A.D.2d 1065; Dedario v New York Tel. Co., 162 A.D.2d 1001, 1003). Although there is no proof that the ladder plaintiff was using was defective, he fell while working at an elevated work site as a result of the absence of adequate safety devices, and thus was entitled to partial summary judgment on liability under the statute (see, Ellis v Hammond Irving, 217 A.D.2d 923).


Summaries of

Golda v. Hutchinson Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 1995
219 A.D.2d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Golda v. Hutchinson Enterprises, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GOLDA et al., Respondents, v. HUTCHINSON ENTERPRISES, INC., Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1995

Citations

219 A.D.2d 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 364

Citing Cases

Joblon v. Solow

Id. On the other hand, Joblon has cited Golda v. Hutchinson Enterprises, Inc., 632 N.Y.S.2d 364 (4th Dep't…