Gold v. Weissman

Full title: NORALEE GOLD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. I. DONALD WEISSMAN et al.…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division

Date published: Feb 10, 2004

No. B160578 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2004)

Opinion

Page 607a

115 Cal.App.4th 607a __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ NORALEE GOLD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. I. DONALD WEISSMAN et al., Defendants and Respondents. B160578 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Eighth Division February 10, 2004

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC 051249

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:^*

* COOPER, P.J. RUBIN, J. BOLAND, J.

GOOD CAUSE appearing the opinion filed in the above entitled matter on January 18, 2004, is modified as follows:

1. Change the second sentence of the third paragraph on page 2 which reads:

Weissman asked for more time to pursue the attorney service and in the meantime suggested that appellant file a complaint against her doctor with the California Board of Medical Quality Assurance (BMQA). to read as follows:

Weissman asked for more time to pursue the attorney service and in the meantime suggested that appellant file a complaint against her doctor with the Division of Medical Quality of the Medical Board of California (the "Board").

2. Add the following footnote at the end of this sentence:

1 The parties' briefs refer to filing a complaint with the California Board of Medical Quality Assurance, but in 1990 the agency's name changed to the Medical Board of California. (See Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 2002 & 2003.)

3. Replace all references to "BMQA" in the opinion to "Board."

These modifications effect no change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.