From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gold v. Churnin

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 26, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 440 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

May 26, 1959

Appeal from the Nassau County District Court, JOHN DALY, J.

Neil Huttner for appellant.

No appearance for respondents.


The judgment should be unanimously modified on the law by adding interest, costs and disbursements to plaintiff's recovery and as so modified affirmed, without costs on this appeal.

While the court properly limited plaintiff's recovery to the sum of $75, it was error to disallow costs. There was no compliance with the provisions of section 174-a of the Civil Practice Act, and therefore the defendants were not relieved from the payment of costs.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.


Summaries of

Gold v. Churnin

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 26, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 440 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Gold v. Churnin

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN GOLD, Appellant, v. EDITH CHURNIN et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: May 26, 1959

Citations

18 Misc. 2d 440 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
193 N.Y.S.2d 486

Citing Cases

Lasro Corp. v. Kree Institute of Electrolysis, Inc.

The defendant failed to comply with the provisions of section 174-a of the Civil Practice Act which requires…