From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golay v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 2, 2016
Case No. CV 14-5087-RGK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-5087-RGK (JEM)

12-02-2016

HELEN LOUISE GOLAY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: December 2, 2016

/s/_________

R. GARY KLAUSNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Golay v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 2, 2016
Case No. CV 14-5087-RGK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Golay v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:HELEN LOUISE GOLAY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 2, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 14-5087-RGK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2016)