From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gojo Indus., Inc. v. Buckeye Int'l, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 9, 2012
469 F. App'x 887 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-1550

03-09-2012

GOJO INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUCKEYE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

RAY L. WEBER, Renner, Kenner, Greive, Bobak, Taylor & Weber, of Akron, Ohio, argued for Plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was LAURA J. GENTILCORE. JENNIFER E. HOEKEL, Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief was RICHARD L. BROPHY.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in No. 09-CV-2612, Senior Judge David D. Dowd, Jr.

JUDGMENT

RAY L. WEBER, Renner, Kenner, Greive, Bobak, Taylor & Weber, of Akron, Ohio, argued for Plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was LAURA J. GENTILCORE.

JENNIFER E. HOEKEL, Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief was RICHARD L. BROPHY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

______________

Jan horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Gojo Indus., Inc. v. Buckeye Int'l, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 9, 2012
469 F. App'x 887 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Gojo Indus., Inc. v. Buckeye Int'l, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GOJO INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUCKEYE INTERNATIONAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 9, 2012

Citations

469 F. App'x 887 (Fed. Cir. 2012)