From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goins v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 1, 2011
Case No. 3:10cv551/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10cv551/LAC/EMT.

September 1, 2011


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 18, 2011 (doc. 36). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim concerning the deprivation of adequate medical treatment for Hepatitis C is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);

3. Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);

4. Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to assert them in state court; and

5. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2011.


Summaries of

Goins v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 1, 2011
Case No. 3:10cv551/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Goins v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD C. GOINS, Plaintiff, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:10cv551/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 1, 2011)