From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goins v. Dimaculangan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 18, 2021
2:18-cv-00034-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-00034-TLN-CKD

11-18-2021

RAYMOND LEE GOINS, Plaintiff, v. A. DIMACULANGAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 6, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 122.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. 1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 6, 2021, (ECF No. 122), are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 2


Summaries of

Goins v. Dimaculangan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 18, 2021
2:18-cv-00034-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Goins v. Dimaculangan

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND LEE GOINS, Plaintiff, v. A. DIMACULANGAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 18, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-00034-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2021)