From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gohn v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 4, 1983
467 A.2d 103 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)

Opinion

Argued September 15, 1983

November 4, 1983.

Argued September 15, 1983, before Judges MacPHAIL, DOYLE and BARBIERI, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 3134 C.D. 1982, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County in the case of Charles Gohn, William M. Gorrecht, Amos Groon, Lewis Bachman, Paul Market, John Achhammer, Isaac Getz, Wilbur Houck, James Gable and Thomas Gable v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Columbia, Pennsylvania, Trust Book No. 47, Page 361.

Application to the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Columbia for zoning variance. Variance granted. Protestants appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County. Appeal sustained. BUCKWALTER, J. Applicant appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Affirmed.

David T. Mountz, Mountz Reinaker, for appellant.

Joanne C. Betlem, with her Lavere C. Senft, Liverant, Senft and Cohen, for appellees.


Pollock-Columbia (Appellant) has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County which reversed a decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Columbia (Board) and denied Appellant's variance application.

Appellant is the lessee of a 5.6 acre tract of land which it proposes to use as a junkyard. Since junkyards are prohibited as a use in the industrial zoning district where the subject property is located, Appellant applied for a variance from the terms of the ordinance. The Board's decision granting the variance was reversed by the common pleas court, which did not take additional evidence, on the ground that the Board failed to find and Appellant failed to demonstrate, that denial of the variance would result in unnecessary hardship.

Having reviewed the briefs and record in this case, we find ourselves in agreement with the disposition by the common pleas court of the issues presented. We accordingly, will affirm on the basis of the able opinion of Judge BUCKWALTER, Gohn v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Columbia, ___ Pa. D. C.3d ___ (1982).

We note one minor citation error. It is Section 90-37(B), rather than Section 90-34(B), of the Columbia Code which excludes junkyards from the industrial zoning district. See Gohn, slip op. at 1.

ORDER

The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, dated November 16, 1982, is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

Gohn v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 4, 1983
467 A.2d 103 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)
Case details for

Gohn v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Case Details

Full title:Charles Gohn et al. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 4, 1983

Citations

467 A.2d 103 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)
467 A.2d 103