From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goesel v. Boley International

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Oct 6, 2009
No. 09 C 4595 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 6, 2009)

Opinion

No. 09 C 4595.

October 6, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Boley International (H.K.) Ltd. ("Boley") has served notice of its presentment on October 8 of proposed amendments to Complaint ¶¶ 28-34, based on its counsel's having missed the September 29 filing date set by this Court's September 21 memorandum order ("Order"). This Court never denies a request for such a short extension on grounds of untimeliness — but in this instance the proposed pleading is itself unacceptable.

If Boley and its counsel wish to get the benefit of a deemed denial, Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule") 8(b)(5) and the Order define the path that must be taken. Actual denials that are said to be "based on a lack of sufficient information" do not conform to Rule 11's requirements of subjective and objective good faith. Boley's motion is denied.


Summaries of

Goesel v. Boley International

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Oct 6, 2009
No. 09 C 4595 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Goesel v. Boley International

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW GOESEL, et al., etc., Plaintiffs, v. BOLEY INTERNATIONAL (H.K.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 6, 2009

Citations

No. 09 C 4595 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 6, 2009)