From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godley v. North Carolina Department

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 7, 2010
397 F. App'x 857 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1728.

Submitted: September 30, 2010.

Decided: October 7, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:10-cv-01071-HFF).

Willie M. Godley, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Willie M. Godley appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 Supp. 2010). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Godley that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Godley has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Godley v. North Carolina Department

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 7, 2010
397 F. App'x 857 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Godley v. North Carolina Department

Case Details

Full title:Willie M. GODLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 7, 2010

Citations

397 F. App'x 857 (4th Cir. 2010)