From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godinez v. Jaddou

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 12, 2023
2:23-cv-1267-TL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-1267-TL

10-12-2023

MOISES MARGARITO GODINEZ, Plaintiff, v. UR MENDOZA JADDOU, et al., Defendants.

TESSA M. GORMAN Acting United States Attorney MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Attorneys for Defendants KATHERINE H. RICH, Attorney for Plaintiff


Noted for Consideration on: October 11, 2023

TESSA M. GORMAN

Acting United States Attorney

MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

Attorneys for Defendants

KATHERINE H. RICH,

Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATED MOTION TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TANA LIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 7(d)(1), 10(g) and 16, hereby jointly stipulate and move to stay these proceedings until December 7, 2023. Plaintiff brings this litigation pursuant to the Mandamus Act seeking, inter alia, to compel the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to compel action on his Form I-918, Application for U Nonimmigrant Status, and Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization. Defendants' response to the Complaint is currently due on October 23, 2023. For good cause, the parties request that the Court hold this case in abeyance until December 7, 2023.

Courts have “broad discretion” to stay proceedings. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997). “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 1.

With additional time, this case may be resolved without the need of further judicial intervention. Although this case had been assigned to an officer for review and adjudication, USCIS had to recently re-assigned Plaintiff's case to a new officer. This officer is in the process of obtaining the Plaintiff's A-file, which is being returned by the formerly assigned officer. Once the newly assigned officer has the A-file, USCIS will evaluate Plaintiff's application for waiting list placement and employment authorization.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the instant action be stayed until December 7, 2023. The parties will submit a joint status report on or before December 7, 2023. The parties further request that this Court vacate its Order Regarding Initial Disclosures and Joint Status Report. Dkt. No. 8.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The case is held in abeyance until December 7, 2023. The parties shall submit a joint status report on or before December 7, 2023. The Order Regarding Initial Disclosures and Joint Status Report (Dkt. No. 8) is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Godinez v. Jaddou

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 12, 2023
2:23-cv-1267-TL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Godinez v. Jaddou

Case Details

Full title:MOISES MARGARITO GODINEZ, Plaintiff, v. UR MENDOZA JADDOU, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Oct 12, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-1267-TL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2023)