From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godhigh v. Lapierrie

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jun 8, 2022
3:22-cv-601-MMH-LLL (M.D. Fla. Jun. 8, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-601-MMH-LLL

06-08-2022

MARIO GODHIGH, Plaintiff, v. OFFICR W. LAPIERRIE, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Mario Godhigh, an inmate of the Florida penal system, initiated this action by filing a pro se Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Petition; Doc. 1)0F with an exhibit (Doc. 1-1). Godhigh requests that the Court issue a writ of mandamus against Ricky Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections (FDOC), Officer W. Lapierrie, and Sergeant S. Saint. Petition at 2. He contends Dixon is responsible for ensuring all FDOC employees execute their duties. Id. Godhigh contends Officer Lapierrie and Sergeant Saint retaliated against him when they lied and told the property officer that Godhigh had “something” on his music tablet. Doc. 1-1 at 1. The property officer then confiscated his tablet. Id.

For all pleadings and documents filed in this case, the Court cites to the document and page numbers as assigned by the Court's Electronic Case Filing System.

A federal court may issue a mandamus order “to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.” 28 U.S.C. § 1361. The Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Godhigh's Petition because neither the Secretary of the FDOC, nor his employees, are officers or employees of the United States. See, e.g., Lamar v. 118th Judicial Dist. Court of Tex., 440 F.2d 383, 384 (5th Cir. 1971) (“[F]ederal courts have no general power to issue writs of mandamus to direct state courts and their judicial officers in the performance of their duties.”); Lawrence v. Miami-Dade Cnty. State Att'y Office, 272 Fed.Appx. 781, 781 (11th Cir. 2008) (“Because the only relief [petitioner] sought was a writ of mandamus compelling action from state officials, not federal officials, the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant relief and did not err in dismissing the petition.”) Accordingly, Godhigh's Petition shall be dismissed without prejudice.

Therefore, it is now

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Godhigh's Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. 1) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

2. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice, terminating any pending motions, and closing the case.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Godhigh v. Lapierrie

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jun 8, 2022
3:22-cv-601-MMH-LLL (M.D. Fla. Jun. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Godhigh v. Lapierrie

Case Details

Full title:MARIO GODHIGH, Plaintiff, v. OFFICR W. LAPIERRIE, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jun 8, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-601-MMH-LLL (M.D. Fla. Jun. 8, 2022)