From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godfrey v. Mancini Safe Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 2, 2014
121 A.D.3d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-2

Betty GODFREY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. MANCINI SAFE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Raymond Schwartzberg & Associates, New York (Raymond Schwartzberg of counsel), for appellant. Goldman & Grossman, New York (Eleanor R. Goldman of counsel), for Mancini Safe Corporation, respondent.


Raymond Schwartzberg & Associates, New York (Raymond Schwartzberg of counsel), for appellant. Goldman & Grossman, New York (Eleanor R. Goldman of counsel), for Mancini Safe Corporation, respondent.
Law Offices of Edward M. Eustace, White Plains (Patricia Mooney of counsel), for EXL Safe Corporation, respondent.

Law Office of James J. Toomey, New York (Eric P. Tosca of counsel), for Schwab Corporation, respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered November 20, 2012, which granted defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff's failure to identify the defect that caused her injury and to attribute such a defect to defendants' negligence is fatal to her claims ( see Siegel v. City of New York, 86 A.D.3d 452, 454, 928 N.Y.S.2d 1 [1st Dept.2011] ). Plaintiff's speculation that a malfunction in a drawer of a metal safe caused the door of that safe to strike her in the back is insufficient to create a triable issue of fact.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. GONZALEZ, P.J., SAXE, RICHTER, FEINMAN, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Godfrey v. Mancini Safe Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 2, 2014
121 A.D.3d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Godfrey v. Mancini Safe Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Betty GODFREY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. MANCINI SAFE CORPORATION, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 2, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
121 A.D.3d 413
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6662

Citing Cases

Zuniga v. 226 E. 54TH St. Rest., Inc.

In support of their motion, defendants first argue that the complaint should be dismissed because plaintiff…

Petrone v. City of Long Beach

; Godfrey v Mancini Safe Corp., 121 A.D.3d 413 (1st Dept. 2014); Ash v City of New York, 109 A.D.3d 854 (2d…