From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godbey v. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C 11-03867 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-03867 WHA

11-17-2011

MARK GODBEY, Plaintiff, v. MEGAN FULLER, DAN HARKINS, NEOMA GOTTLIEB, and MAUREEN BRYAN-FURGURSON, Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE AND VACATING

MOTION HEARING

On November 1, 2011, defendants Megan Fuller and Maureen Bryan-Furgurson filed a motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 16). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion was due on November 15. None was filed. Accordingly, plaintiff Mark Godbey is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his claims against defendants Fuller and Bryan-Furgurson should not be dismissed for failure to oppose the motion. Plaintiff Mark Godbey must file a written response to this order by DECEMBER 1, 2011 . If no response is filed or if good cause is not shown, then the motion may be granted or the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The motion hearing previously set for December 15, 2011, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Godbey v. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C 11-03867 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Godbey v. Fuller

Case Details

Full title:MARK GODBEY, Plaintiff, v. MEGAN FULLER, DAN HARKINS, NEOMA GOTTLIEB, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-03867 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)