From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godbey v. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No. C 11-03867 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-03867 WHA

10-28-2011

MARK GODBEY, Plaintiff, v. MEGAN FULLER, DAN HARKINS, NEOMA GOTTLIEB, and MAUREEN BRYAN-FURGURSON, Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING MOTION HEARING

On October 12, 2011, defendant Dan Harkins filed a motion to dismiss or strike the complaint (Dkt. No. 11). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion was due on October 26. None was filed. Accordingly, plaintiff Mark Godbey is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his claims against defendant Harkins should not be dismissed for failure to oppose the motion. Plaintiff Mark Godbey must file a written response to this order by NOVEMBER 21, 2011 . If no response is filed or if good cause is not shown, then the motion may be granted. The motion hearing previously set for November 17, 2011, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Godbey v. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No. C 11-03867 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Godbey v. Fuller

Case Details

Full title:MARK GODBEY, Plaintiff, v. MEGAN FULLER, DAN HARKINS, NEOMA GOTTLIEB, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-03867 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)