Opinion
Civil Action 23-CV-3398
09-11-2023
INNA VLADI GNIPP, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA INSURANCE DEPARTMENT COMMISSIONER, Defendant.
ORDER
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2023, upon consideration of Plaintiff Inna Vladi Gnipp's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1), Complaint (ECF No. 2), and motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3), it is ORDERED that:
1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 2. The Complaint is DEEMED filed. 3. The motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) is DENIED as premature. 4. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons in the Court's Memorandum. 5. Gnipp may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Any amended complaint must identify all defendants in the caption of the amended complaint in addition to identifying them in the body of the amended complaint and shall state the basis for Gnipp's claims against each defendant. The amended complaint shall be a complete document that does not rely on the initial Complaint or other papers filed in this case to state a claim. When drafting her 2 amended complaint, Gnipp should be mindful of the Court's reasons for dismissing the claims in her initial Complaint as explained in the Court's Memorandum. Upon the filing of an amended complaint, the Clerk shall not make service until so ORDERED by the Court. 6. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Gnipp a blank copy of this Court's current standard form to be used by a self-represented litigant filing an employment discrimination action bearing the above-captioned civil action number. Gnipp may use this form to file her amended complaint if she chooses to do so. 7. If Gnipp does not wish to amend her Complaint and instead intends to stand on her Complaint as originally pled, she may file a notice with the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order stating that intent, at which time the Court will issue a final order dismissing the case. Any such notice should be titled “Notice to Stand on Complaint,” and shall include the civil action number for this case. See Weber v. McGrogan, 939 F.3d 232 (3d Cir. 2019) (“If the plaintiff does not desire to amend, he may file an appropriate notice with the district court asserting his intent to stand on the complaint, at which time an order to dismiss the action would be appropriate.” (quoting Borelli v. City of Reading, 532 F.2d 950, 951 n.1 (3d Cir. 1976))); In re Westinghouse Sec. Litig., 90 F.3d 696, 703-04 (3d Cir. 1996) (holding “that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed with prejudice the otherwise viable claims . . . following plaintiffs' decision not to replead those claims” when the district 3 court “expressly warned plaintiffs that failure to replead the remaining claims . . . would result in the dismissal of those claims”). 8. If Gnipp fails to file any response to this Order, the Court will conclude that Gnipp intends to stand on her Complaint and will issue a final order dismissing this case. See Weber, 939 F.3d at 239-40 (explaining that a plaintiff's intent to stand on his complaint may be inferred from inaction after issuance of an order directing him to take action to cure a defective complaint).