Papst Licensing GmbH v. Xilinx, Inc.

Full title: PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG, Plaintiff-Appellant v. XILINX, INC.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 12, 2017

2016-2323 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2323

04-12-2017

PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG, Plaintiff-Appellant v. XILINX, INC., Defendant-Appellee

NICOLE E. GLAUSER, DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Hardy LLP, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ANDREW DINOVO, JAY D. ELLWANGER. MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; DAVID B. COCHRAN, Cleveland, OH.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:16-cv-00925-LHK, Judge Lucy H. Koh.

JUDGMENT

NICOLE E. GLAUSER, DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Hardy LLP, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ANDREW DINOVO, JAY D. ELLWANGER. MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; DAVID B. COCHRAN, Cleveland, OH. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 12, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court