From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GMBH v. GMBH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 18, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 14-736-JWD-SCR (M.D. La. Mar. 18, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 14-736-JWD-SCR

03-18-2015

GERMAN SPORT GUNS GMBH v. HECKLER & KOCH GMBH, ET AL


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge's Report dated February 27, 2015, to which no objection was filed.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Remand filed by plaintiff German Sport Guns GmbH is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs' request for an award of expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) is denied.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on March 18, 2015.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

GMBH v. GMBH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 18, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 14-736-JWD-SCR (M.D. La. Mar. 18, 2015)
Case details for

GMBH v. GMBH

Case Details

Full title:GERMAN SPORT GUNS GMBH v. HECKLER & KOCH GMBH, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 18, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 14-736-JWD-SCR (M.D. La. Mar. 18, 2015)

Citing Cases

Wiltz v. Walmart Inc.

The court must consider the propriety of the removing party's actions at the time of removal, based on an…

Mergist v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

The court must consider the propriety of the removing party's actions at the time of removal, based on an…