From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Bruce

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 26, 2010
No. 2:10-cv-00948 GEB KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-00948 GEB KJN PS.

July 26, 2010


ORDER


Defendants, who removed this case to federal court, are proceeding without counsel. The court is in receipt of defendants' request to appear via telephone at the following court proceedings: (1) the hearing on plaintiff's motion for a remand to state court, which is presently set for August 12, 2010; and (2) the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, which is presently set for September 23, 2010. (See Dkt. Nos. 8, 9.) Defendants, who state that they are unable to travel at all due to their disabilities, seek these accommodations pursuant to an unspecified provision of Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act ("ADA"). They also seek an order permitting them to appear at all future court proceedings via telephone. (Id.)

Although the court makes no finding regarding whether defendants are entitled to appear by telephone pursuant to Title II of the ADA, the court will grant defendants' requests to appear by telephone at the two court proceedings specified in defendants' requests. However, without more of a showing or explanation regarding why it is "impossible" for both defendants to travel due to each defendant being disabled, the court will not grant defendants' request to appear at all future court proceedings by telephone.

The undersigned notes that Title II of the ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of a disability by a "public entity."See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12132. In relevant part, Title II of the ADA further defines "public entity" as "any State or local government," not the federal government or a federal court. See id. § 12131(1). Although it appears that defendants' reliance on Title II of the ADA appears to be misplaced, the undersigned need not ultimately resolve defendants' claim in this order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' requests to appear via telephone at court proceedings (Dkt. Nos. 8, 9) are granted in part.

2. Defendants may appear via telephone at: (1) the hearing on plaintiff's motion for a remand to state court, which is presently set for August 12, 2010; and (2) the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, which is presently set for September 23, 2010.

3. Defendants' request for an order permitting them to appear at all future court proceedings by telephone is denied without prejudice. Defendants may file requests to appear telephonically at future hearings and court proceedings on a hearing-by-hearing basis.


Summaries of

GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Bruce

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 26, 2010
No. 2:10-cv-00948 GEB KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2010)
Case details for

GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Bruce

Case Details

Full title:GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC FKA GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. NICOLETTE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 26, 2010

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-00948 GEB KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2010)