From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glymph v. Roe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 15, 2016
Case No. CV 99-3045 SVW (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 99-3045 SVW (MRW)

06-15-2016

KENNETH DERWIN GLYMPH, Petitioner, v. E. ROE, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Supplemental Statement of Decision. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATE: June 15, 2016

/s/_________

HON. STEPHEN V. WILSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Glymph v. Roe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 15, 2016
Case No. CV 99-3045 SVW (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Glymph v. Roe

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH DERWIN GLYMPH, Petitioner, v. E. ROE, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 99-3045 SVW (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2016)