From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gluck v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 20, 2020
Case No. 3:19-cv-02518-M-BT (N.D. Tex. Jul. 20, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 3:19-cv-02518-M-BT

07-20-2020

ANDREI GLUCK, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated June 24, 2020 (ECF No. 20). The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Return of Seized Property (ECF No. 4) is DENIED. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint bringing a Bivens claim within 30 days of the date of this Order.

SO ORDERED, this 20th day of July, 2020.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Gluck v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 20, 2020
Case No. 3:19-cv-02518-M-BT (N.D. Tex. Jul. 20, 2020)
Case details for

Gluck v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ANDREI GLUCK, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 20, 2020

Citations

Case No. 3:19-cv-02518-M-BT (N.D. Tex. Jul. 20, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Travalino

The burden only shifts to the Government if the motion is “brought after the criminal proceeding is over” and…