Opinion
December 19, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff demonstrated, prima facie, that she was entitled to summary judgment. The hearsay affirmation of the appellant's counsel which was submitted in opposition to the motion, was insufficient to defeat it (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 559, 563).
We have reviewed the appellant's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.