Opinion
Civil Action No. 1:05-cv-3245-GET.
August 4, 2006
ORDER
The above-styled matter is presently before the court on the Magistrate Judge's Non-Final Report and Recommendation [docket no. 8].
On December 21, 2005, plaintiff filed this employment discrimination claim and defendants were served with process on January 19, 2006. Defendants did not answer the complaint and the Clerk of Court entered default on May 11, 2006.
On May 12, 2006, plaintiff moved for default judgment and requested a hearing to determine the amount of damages. On dune 13, 2006, the magistrate judge issued a NON-FINAL Report and Recommendation ("R R") granting plaintiff's request for an evidentiary hearing on damages and holding in abeyance plaintiff's motion for default judgment until after the hearing.
Pursuant to 28 B.S.C. § 636 (b) (1), each party may file written objections, if any, to the R R within ten (10) days of the receipt of an order. If any party serves and files written objections, the district court is required to conduct a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (C). No objections have been filed. Accordingly, the court hereby ADOPTS AS UNOPPOSED and incorporates herein by reference as if fully set forth the Magistrate Judge's NON-FINAL R R [docket no. 8] GRANTING plaintiff's request for an evidentiary hearing and HOLDING IN ABEYANCE plaintiff's motion for default judgment [docket no. 6].
Summary
The Magistrate Judge's Non-Final Report and Recommendation [docket no. 8] GRANTING plaintiff's request for an evidentiary hearing and HOLDING IN ABEYANCE plaintiff's motion for default judgment [docket no. 6] is ADOPTED AS UNOPPOSED and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth.
SO ORDERED.