From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glotzer v. Finkle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 1998
254 A.D.2d 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 20, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).


The motion court's finding that plaintiff did not reside in Bronx County at the time she commenced this action is fully supported by the record, which contains the affidavit of one of the defendants stating that plaintiff, her grandmother, had moved to Florida from the Bronx more than two years before commencement of the action, and does not contain any contemporaneous documentary evidence, or even an affidavit by plaintiff or any other person having knowledge, showing that plaintiff was residing in the Bronx at the time she commenced the action. Ample opportunity was given plaintiff to adduce proof on the issue of her residence, and no reasons are given why she did not. Accordingly, Schenectady County, the only county in the State in which any of the parties resided when the action was commenced, was the proper venue under CPLR 503 (a). Pursuant to CPLR 2001, the demand to change venue served with the answer, which incorrectly identified Albany County as the proper venue although it correctly stated that defendants resided in Schenectady County, is deemed corrected nunc pro tunc to seek a change of venue to Schenectady County. The error was apparent from the face of the demand, and plaintiff was at all times aware that defendants resided in Schenectady County.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Glotzer v. Finkle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 1998
254 A.D.2d 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Glotzer v. Finkle

Case Details

Full title:DORA GLOTZER, Appellant, v. DAN FINKLE et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 36

Citing Cases

Jason v. Dumel

Pursuant to CPLR § 2001, the court will deem defendants' motion for a change of venue as of right to be based…