From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gloth v. Brusco Equities

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 2003
1 A.D.3d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2292.

November 25, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J.), entered January 2, 2003, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Kenneth J. Halperin, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Brian J. Isaac, for Defendants-Respondents.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Rosenberger, Friedman, JJ.


There is no evidence that defendants had actual or constructive notice of the defective condition that caused plaintiff's injury (see Juarez v. Wavecrest Mgt. Team, 88 N.Y.2d 628, 646). The court properly disregarded plaintiff's affidavit on the issue of notice since it contradicted his prior deposition testimony and was clearly tailored to create an issue of fact (Phillips v. Bronx Lebanon Hosp., 268 A.D.2d 318, 320).


Summaries of

Gloth v. Brusco Equities

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 2003
1 A.D.3d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Gloth v. Brusco Equities

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER J.P. GLOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRUSCO EQUITIES, LLC, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 25, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 593

Citing Cases

Branham v. Loews

Thus, far from raising a triable issue of fact as to the duration of the boy's presence, Mulzac's affidavit…

Vaughn v. Harlem River Yard Ventures, Inc.

Under these circumstances, where plaintiff's affidavit directly contradicts her prior deposition testimony,…