From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gloster v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 26, 1990
568 So. 2d 1318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-01906.

October 26, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, William J. Nelson, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Wendy Friedberg, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We find no merit to appellant's contention concerning his convictions. Therefore, we affirm appellant's convictions for armed robbery, aggravated battery, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

With respect to the sentences imposed we find no error except in the "stacking" of mandatory minimum sentences. Pursuant to section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1987), the trial court was required to impose a minimum term of three years for all of the offenses except the firearm possession charge. Two of the three mandatory sentences were to be served concurrently, but the trial court provided that the third (involving a different victim) would be consecutive. However, notwithstanding the fact different victims were involved, all three offenses occurred without interruption in time or location. Consecutive mandatory minimum terms were therefore unauthorized. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1983); Hernandez v. State, 556 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY and HALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gloster v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 26, 1990
568 So. 2d 1318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Gloster v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLEM GLOSTER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 26, 1990

Citations

568 So. 2d 1318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Staten v. State

Second, we conclude that even though there were two victims involved, it was error for the trial court to…

State v. Paulino

We remand for correction. Sanders v. State, 663 So.2d 674 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). In doing so, we also note that…