From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gloria Barad v. Bank of Commerce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1967
27 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

March 20, 1967


Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 14, 1966, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs, on the ground that the complaint failed to allege facts from which damages can properly be inferred ( Watts v. Bank of Manhattan Co., 83 N.Y.S.2d 57, affd. 274 App. Div. 884; cf. Daukas v. Shearson, Hammill Co., 26 A.D.2d 526). The time to serve an amended complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Appeal from order of said court dated January 14, 1966 dismissed, without costs. Said order was superseded by the order dated March 14, 1966 and made on reargument. Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gloria Barad v. Bank of Commerce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1967
27 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Gloria Barad v. Bank of Commerce

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA BARAD, as Administratrix of the Estate of FRANCES V. ROTHENBERG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1967

Citations

27 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)