In Glor v. Kelly (25 App. Div. 631) it was held that in a case evenly balanced as to witnesses, the county in which the cause of action originated was an important circumstance to be taken into account in determining the motion.
Summary of this case from Kubiac v. ClementFebruary Term, 1898.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to abide the event. All concurred.
In Glor v. Kelly (25 App. Div. 631) it was held that in a case evenly balanced as to witnesses, the county in which the cause of action originated was an important circumstance to be taken into account in determining the motion.
Summary of this case from Kubiac v. ClementFull title:Edward P. Glor and Frank F. Glor, Respondents, v. James W.H. Kelly…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Feb 1, 1898
The affidavits used upon the motion show very clearly that the cause of action originated in Niagara county,…