From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Globe Union v. Baker

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 1, 1974
317 A.2d 26 (Del. 1974)

Opinion

March 1, 1974.

Upon appeal from Superior Court. Affirmed.

Carl Schnee, of Tybout, Redfearn Schnee, Wilmington, for employer below, appellant.

Harvey B. Rubenstein, Wilmington, for claimants below, appellees.

Before HERRMANN, Chief Justice, DUFFY, Associate Justice, and BROWN, Vice Chancellor.


In these consolidated workmen's compensation cases, the Superior Court affirmed the awards of the Industrial Accident Board for partial disability due to compensable occupational disease. See Opinion below at 310 A.2d 883 (1973). The employer appeals.

It appears that the contentions raised here were all considered below. We agree with the conclusions of the Superior Court for the reasons stated in its careful Opinion.

The appellant relies especially upon Glodowski v. Industrial Commission, 11 Wis.2d 525, 105 N.W.2d 833 (1961); Goudie v. Lakey Foundry Machine Co., 327 Mich. 138, 41 N.W.2d 496 (1950); and Brown v. Consolidation Coal Company, 224 Tenn. 144, 451 S.W.2d 684 (1970). By reason of differences in controlling statutes and disagreement with rationale, we find the cited cases unpersuasive. See 2 Larson, Workmen's Compensation, 88.11-88.13, 88.15.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Globe Union v. Baker

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 1, 1974
317 A.2d 26 (Del. 1974)
Case details for

Globe Union v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:GLOBE UNION, INC., Employer Below, Appellant, v. Charles BAKER et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Mar 1, 1974

Citations

317 A.2d 26 (Del. 1974)

Citing Cases

Holben v. Pepsi Bottling Ventures, LLC

The employee must show that the reason for the reduction was the injury.Globe Union, Inc. v. Baker, 310 A.2d…

Stewart v. Oliver B. Cannon Son, Inc.

The issue at bar is whether the Board's finding that appellant failed to meet its burden of establishing by a…