From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Global Liberty Ins. Co. v. Prof'l Chiropractic Care, P.C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 31, 2016
139 A.D.3d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

1341N, 261079/14.

05-31-2016

In re GLOBAL LIBERTY INSURANCE CO., Petitioner–Appellant, v. PROFESSIONAL CHIROPRACTIC CARE, P.C., etc., Respondent–Respondent.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., Garden City (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel), for appellant. The Law Office of Sukhibir Singh, Richmond Hill (Ralph C. Caio of counsel), for respondent.


The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., Garden City (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel), for appellant.

The Law Office of Sukhibir Singh, Richmond Hill (Ralph C. Caio of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered July 10, 2015, which denied the petition to vacate a master arbitrator's award, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition granted, and the award vacated. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. The Master Arbitrator's award was arbitrary because it irrationally ignored the law, which petitioner insurer had presented to the Master Arbitrator, that the no-fault policy issued by petitioner was void ab initio due to respondent's assignor's failure to attend duly scheduled independent medical exams (see American Tr. Ins. Co. v. Lucas, 111 A.D.3d 423, 424, 974 N.Y.S.2d 388 [1st Dept.2013] ). The alleged error in petitioner's denial of claim form is of “no moment” (Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v. Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC, 82 A.D.3d 559, 560, 918 N.Y.S.2d 473 [1st Dept.2011], lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 705, 2011 WL 2535157 [2011] ), and was not a sufficient or rational basis for the award (see Auto One Ins. Co. v. Hillside Chiropractic, P.C., 126 A.D.3d 423, 424, 2 N.Y.S.3d 343 [1st Dept. 2015], citing Matter of Petrofsky [Allstate Ins. Co.], 54 N.Y.2d 207, 211, 445 N.Y.S.2d 77, 429 N.E.2d 755 [1981] ).

Respondent waived its objections regarding improper service of the petition, since it never moved to dismiss the petition on those grounds (see CPLR 3211 [e]; B.N. Realty Assoc. v. Lichtenstein, 21 A.D.3d 793, 796, 801 N.Y.S.2d 271 [1st Dept.2005] ; Matter of Resnick v. Town of Canaan, 38 A.D.3d 949, 951, 832 N.Y.S.2d 102 [3d Dept.2007] ).

FRIEDMAN, J.P., RENWICK, MOSKOWITZ, RICHTER, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Global Liberty Ins. Co. v. Prof'l Chiropractic Care, P.C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 31, 2016
139 A.D.3d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Global Liberty Ins. Co. v. Prof'l Chiropractic Care, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:In re Global Liberty Insurance Co., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Professional…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 31, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4156
30 N.Y.S.3d 868

Citing Cases

Glob. Liberty Ins. Co. v. ISurply, LLC

The court properly confirmed the master arbitrator's award. The master arbitrator's affirmance of the lower…

Glob. Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Top Q. Inc.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered August 31, 2018, which denied the…