Summary
In Global Apogee, defendants' evidence included a consumer survey conducted by an expert as to consumers' understanding of the terms at issue, as well as media usages.
Summary of this case from Tex. Tamale Co. v. Cpusa2, LLCOpinion
CV 18-05162-PSG-E
03-31-2023
GLOBAL APOGEE, Plaintiff, v. SUGARFINA, Inc., et al., Defendants.
JUDGMENT
HONORABLE PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
WHEREAS, on March 31, 2023, this Court GRANTED in part and DENIED in part Defendant Joshua Reznick and Defendant Rosie O'Neill's (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment [82] against Plaintiff Global Apogee (“Plaintiff”) and DISMISSED all claims and counterclaims, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED, upon the findings of the Court, that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff, in accordance with this Court's previous Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.
As no Defendants remain, the Clerk shall close this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.